Saving session work…
Pre-Session Prep0%

Session 3 —
Financial Management

Enter your programme access code to unlock Session 3 — the financial core of the programme.

3
Session 03 · Pre-Session Brief
Financial Management & Fundraising
Before We Begin

Your prep brief

This session is the financial core of the programme. Bring your numbers. Today moves faster and produces more if you arrive with real data rather than estimates.

90 minDeep Work Block 1Money Logic + Pricing
75 minDeep Work Block 2Revenue Model + Scenarios
45 minSynthesis + OutputFunding Strategy + Decision
Three Questions to Sit With
Prep Question 01
What does it cost you — in real hours at an honest hourly rate — to deliver your offer to one customer?
Not the ask price. The cost. Include preparation, delivery, follow-up, and any materials. Most founders undercount this by 40–60% by excluding their own time.
Prep Question 02
What would your first customer reasonably pay — and what is that number based on?
Not what you want to charge. What you have actual evidence they would pay. Base it on conversations, not on what similar products charge.
Prep Question 03
Do you actually need external funding — or do you need better pricing and faster customer acquisition?
Most early-stage founders who think they need investment actually need a higher price and one paying client. Be honest with yourself about which problem you have.
What We Will Build Today
01Pricing Structure Sheet — value-based, defensible, specific to your venture. Not benchmarked against competitors.
0212-Month Revenue Model — three scenarios built from your real assumptions. Conservative, realistic, optimistic — with a clear break-even analysis.
03Funding Strategy Decision — a clear, informed position on whether and how to fund this venture, and what needs to be in place before any external capital conversation.
Pricing Logic · Thinking Check 1 of 3
Block 1 Complete

Pricing Logic Check

Three questions confirming the Block 1 money logic has landed and applying it directly to your venture. These questions are diagnostic — answer what is actually true for your situation.

Check 1 · Question 01
Value-based pricing means you set your price based on…
What your competitors are charging for a similar product or service
Your delivery costs plus a standard profit margin of 20–30%
The cost to the customer of the problem going unsolved — and charging a defensible fraction of that cost
Correct — value-based pricing starts with the customer's problem, not your costs
What you would be willing to pay for this product if you were the customer
Check 1 · Question 02
What does the problem your venture solves currently cost your Profile 1 customer — in time, money, missed opportunity, or pain — if it goes unsolved?
Be as specific and as honest as possible. This is the foundation of your pricing argument.
0 / 400
Check 1 · Question 03
Which financial distinction do most early-stage founders confuse most dangerously?
The difference between cash flow and accounting profit
Revenue and profit — growing revenue while burning through the margin that would make the business sustainable
Correct — revenue growth without margin awareness is the most common path to collapse
The difference between equity and debt financing
The difference between total addressable market and serviceable addressable market
Block 1 · Thinking Check Score
Deliverable 3A · Pricing Structure Sheet
Block 2

Your Pricing Structure

Build your pricing from value reasoning. Every number here should be defensible from first principles — not reverse-engineered from what competitors charge.

Unit Economics Calculator
Fill in your real numbers. The outputs at the bottom update automatically as you type.
Delivery time per client
Total hours to deliver the offer once — including prep, delivery, follow-up
hrs
Your realistic hourly rate
What you would charge consulting at. Be honest — do not undervalue yourself.
€/hr
Your asking price
What you plan to charge the customer
Customer acquisition cost
Hours spent on outreach, content, referrals — per client acquired
hrs
Cost to Deliver
€ —
Hours × rate
Gross Margin
— %
(Price − COGS) / Price
Payback Period
CAC recovered
Fill in your numbers above to see your unit economics analysis.
Pricing Rationale — defend your price from value reasoning
What does the unsolved problem cost the customer? Your price should be a small, defensible fraction of that cost.
Financial Model · Thinking Check 2 of 3
Block 2 — Midpoint

Financial Model Check

Four questions applying scenario planning and financial model thinking to your specific venture before you build the revenue model.

Check 2 · Question 01
A financial model is primarily useful because it…
Predicts accurately what revenue the business will generate in the next 12 months
Makes your assumptions explicit and mathematical — forcing honesty about what needs to be true for the business to work
Correct — a model is a structured set of assumptions, not a prediction
Demonstrates to investors that you have done serious financial planning
Calculates the exact amount of funding required to launch the business
Check 2 · Question 02
In your conservative scenario — the one where everything takes twice as long and costs 20% more — what is your estimated break-even month and what does that require from you?
Base this on the numbers you are about to put into the revenue model. Estimate if you do not have the model built yet — you will refine it in the next block.
0 / 400
Check 2 · Question 03
Which of the three scenarios should you actually operate against day-to-day?
The optimistic scenario — to maintain ambition and not artificially limit yourself
The realistic scenario — it is what you actually plan and execute against, acknowledging normal friction
Correct — optimistic is for investors; conservative is for survival planning; realistic is for operations
The conservative scenario — to always have enough runway and never be surprised
The average of all three scenarios — to balance optimism and caution
Check 2 · Question 04
What is the single financial assumption in your model that would most change the picture if it turned out to be wrong — and how confident are you in it?
0 / 500
Block 2 · Thinking Check Score
Deliverable 3B · 12-Month Revenue Model
Block 2 — Continued

Your Revenue Model

Build three scenarios from your real assumptions. Fill in the inputs for each scenario — the model calculates Year 1 revenue, monthly fixed costs, and break-even automatically.

Conservative
Realistic
Optimistic

Everything takes 2× as long and costs 20% more than expected. This is your survival baseline — not pessimism, discipline.

Clients per month (avg)
Avg revenue per client (€)
Monthly fixed costs (€)
Monthly revenue€ —
Monthly cost (fixed + COGS)€ —
Year 1 revenue total€ —
Break-even month

Things go roughly as expected with normal friction. This is the plan you execute against.

Clients per month (avg)
Avg revenue per client (€)
Monthly fixed costs (€)
Monthly revenue€ —
Monthly cost (fixed + COGS)€ —
Year 1 revenue total€ —
Break-even month

Best assumptions correct plus one unexpected win. Useful for investor conversations — not for operating decisions.

Clients per month (avg)
Avg revenue per client (€)
Monthly fixed costs (€)
Monthly revenue€ —
Monthly cost (fixed + COGS)€ —
Year 1 revenue total€ —
Break-even month
Funding Strategy · End of Session
Session 3 Complete

Funding Strategy Synthesis

Five questions that produce a clear, documented funding strategy and a financial summary. The most important question is the first one.

Synthesis · Question 01
Based on your revenue model, what is your funding decision — and what is the specific reasoning behind it?
Bootstrapping — grow using revenue, maintain full ownership
Correct when: break-even is achievable within 6–12 months without external capital. Revenue can fund growth.
Grants / Non-dilutive funding — apply for public or private grants
Correct when: mission-driven model, innovation focus, or specific eligibility (BPI France, CPF, EU programmes). Slow but free capital.
Angel investment — raise from individual investors
Correct when: you have proof of concept, a scalable model, and need capital to accelerate a proven playbook. Not for pre-validation.
Venture capital — raise institutional investment
Correct when: large market, strong unit economics, clear path to scale. Requires giving up significant equity and control.
Hybrid — combination of the above
Bootstrap to first revenue, then grants for specific initiatives, then angel when scale is proven.
Synthesis · Question 02
What is your funding rationale — why is this the right path for this specific venture at this specific stage?
0 / 400
Synthesis · Question 03
What does the financial model reveal about your business model that surprised you or that you did not fully understand before today?
0 / 500
Synthesis · Question 04
If your conservative scenario plays out — which it might — what specifically would you change about your current business model design?
Raise the price — the model only works at a higher price point than I currently plan
Reduce delivery cost — I need to deliver the offer more efficiently without reducing its value
Increase volume — I need more clients, which requires improving my outreach and conversion
Reduce scope — start smaller and expand once the model is proven at a minimal viable level
The conservative scenario still works — the model is viable even under the worst realistic conditions
Synthesis · Question 05
Draft your brand positioning in one sentence before Session 4. Use this template: "For [target customer], [venture name] is the [market category] that [unique value], unlike [alternative]."
This is the pre-work for Session 4. Write the best version you can today — it will be refined significantly in the next session.
0 / 400
Session 3 · Synthesis Score
Post-Session

Session 3 Reading List

Four texts that extend and deepen the financial thinking from today. The First Round Review article is the minimum — 20 minutes, directly applicable to the pricing decision you just made.

01
Profit First
Mike Michalowicz

Profit First is Michalowicz's direct challenge to the conventional accounting formula — Revenue minus Expenses equals Profit — which he argues guarantees that profit is always an afterthought. His alternative is structurally simple: take profit first, then operate on what remains. The book builds a system of bank accounts and allocation percentages designed to make a business profitable from its first paying client, not from some future scale threshold.

For entrepreneurs, this book solves the problem of perpetually deferred profitability — the trap of believing that profit will arrive once you reach the next growth milestone. Most small and medium businesses never reach sustained profitability not because their revenue is too low but because their spending expands to match it. Michalowicz's system creates the structural discipline that most founders lack because it removes the decision from the monthly balance sheet and puts it into the bank account architecture itself.

Read the first four chapters this week. The Profit First reframe — Revenue minus Profit equals Costs, not the other way around — directly challenges the way you built your three-scenario model today. Apply it to your conservative scenario: what if you committed to taking 10% profit before calculating costs? Does the model still work? If not, what does that tell you about the current design? This is the question that reveals whether your model is genuinely viable or whether it is optimistically structured to look viable without actually being so.

02
The Personal MBA
Josh Kaufman

The Personal MBA is Kaufman's attempt to synthesise the essential concepts from business education into a single accessible reference work — without the cost, time, or credentialing politics of an actual MBA. The book covers business model design, value creation, marketing, sales, finance, operations, and human psychology in a format designed for self-directed learners who need to apply concepts immediately rather than accumulate them theoretically.

For entrepreneurs who did not come from a finance or business background, this book solves the conceptual vocabulary gap — the experience of sitting in a meeting or reading a term sheet and encountering terms that other people seem to understand and use casually. Kaufman's explanations are consistently clear, example-rich, and practically oriented. The financial chapter alone — covering cash flow, valuation, and financial statement literacy — is worth the price of the book for anyone who finds the language of finance opaque or intimidating.

Read the chapter on financial analysis immediately — it will deepen the unit economics work you did in the Pricing Structure Sheet and the vocabulary you will need if you pursue any form of investment conversation. Then read the chapter on value creation to see how it connects to the business model canvas from Session 1. The Personal MBA is designed to be a reference you return to, not a book you read once. After today's session, use it to look up any financial term that came up in the session that you want to understand more fully.

03
Venture Deals
Brad Feld & Jason Mendelson

Venture Deals is the most thorough and readable explanation of how venture capital financing actually works — written by two experienced investors who believe that founders who understand the mechanics of funding are better partners for investors and make better decisions for their companies. The book covers term sheets, valuation, dilution, liquidation preferences, board composition, protective provisions, and the entire anatomy of a financing round from first conversation to closing.

For entrepreneurs considering external investment, this book solves the information asymmetry that typically disadvantages founders in fundraising conversations. Most first-time founders encounter term sheets with no understanding of what the non-standard provisions mean or which terms matter more than others. Feld and Mendelson explain not only what each term means but why investors include it, what founders should push back on, and what the long-term implications of each provision are when the company reaches an exit or a down round.

Only read this book if you chose angel or venture capital as your funding path in the Synthesis today. If you chose bootstrapping or grants, this book is interesting background but not immediately necessary. If you are fundraising, read chapters 1 through 5 this week — they cover the term sheet anatomy and give you the vocabulary you need for investor conversations. The most important chapter for most early-stage founders is chapter 3: understanding valuation, dilution, and what you are actually giving away when you accept a funding offer.

04
"Pricing is a Startup's Most Important Decision"
First Round Review · Article · 20 min read

This First Round Review piece is one of the most practically valuable articles written on startup pricing — pulling together research, founder interviews, and pricing strategy frameworks into a readable, actionable guide. The central argument is that most startups significantly underprice their products and services, not because they lack information about what the market would pay but because underpricing feels safer and more modest than charging what the value actually justifies. The article documents the compounding cost of this mistake.

For entrepreneurs, this article solves the confidence problem in pricing — the discomfort with charging a price that feels high relative to the time invested or the competitor landscape. It reframes pricing as a signal of value and confidence rather than a reflection of cost, and demonstrates with examples how raising prices often increases conversion rates rather than reducing them, because the higher price signals quality and seriousness to customers who were previously uncertain whether the lower price indicated a less credible offering.

Read this tonight, before you finalise the price you entered in the Pricing Structure Sheet. The article will challenge you to ask whether you priced from confidence or from fear, and whether the price you chose reflects what your customer would genuinely pay or what you felt comfortable asking for. This is the most common gap in early pricing decisions, and it is the one that most reliably limits revenue in the first six months of trading. Apply the article's framework to your pricing rationale and see whether your reasoning holds up to its standards.

Session 3 Complete

Your financial work has been saved to your programme record. One session remains.

Your Session 3 Deliverables
Pricing Structure Sheet
Value-based pricing with full unit economics — COGS, gross margin, payback period.
12-Month Revenue Model — 3 Scenarios
Conservative · Realistic · Optimistic with break-even analysis for each.
Funding Strategy Decision
Your documented funding path with specific rationale for this venture and this stage.
Before Session 4 — Your Final Session
Session 4 is Marketing, Communication and Launch. The last session builds on everything. Arrive with these four things done.
Write your brand positioning draft. One sentence. You wrote a first attempt in Synthesis Question 05 today — refine it before Session 4. Show it to one person who fits your target customer description and ask: does this feel like it was written for you?
Identify your first 10 clients. Name them. Not a category — actual names or specific roles at specific organisations. Bring this list to Session 4.
Send at least two of your five outreach scripts and bring back what happened. Session 4 is built around real outreach data, not hypothetical conversations.
Read the First Round Review pricing article. 20 minutes. If the article challenges your price, adjust it before Session 4. It almost certainly will.